United States v. Reitmeyer’s Empirical Analysis
356 F.3d 1313 · 2004
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably United States v. Wood (2004), United States v. Ambort (2005)
11 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1031 · 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 3237 · 18 U.S.C. § 3731 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 50 U.S.C. § 856
Relies on United States v. Marion · United States v. Bailey · Toussie v. United States · Sutton v. United States · Jusino v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'to be liberally interpreted in favor of repose,'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“As a `continuing offense,' mail fraud may be prosecuted in `any district in which such offense was begun, continued, or completed.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We test the indictment ‘solely on the basis of the allegations made on its face, and such allegations are to be taken as true.’ ”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.