Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 356 F.3d 481 - Luna v. Pico

Luna v. Pico’s Empirical Analysis

356 F.3d 481 · 2004

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
1
states following
November 2023
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently November 2023 · most notably Back v. Hastings on Hudson Union Free School District (2004), Sira v. Morton (2004)

13 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

400200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Creighton · Wolff v. McDonnell · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Malley v. Briggs · Sandin v. Conner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the law is defined with reasonable clarity, (2) the Supreme Court or the Second Circuit has recognized the right, and (3) a reasonable defendant [would] have understood from the existing law that [his] conduct was unlawful.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Ascertaining whether this standard is satisfied does not require examination of the entire record, independent assessment of the credibility of witnesses, or weighing of the evidence. Instead, the relevant question is whether there is any evidence in the record that could support the conclusion reached by the disciplinary board.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he contours of the right [allegedly violated are] sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he [or she] is doing violates that right.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.