Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 356 F. Supp. 1292 - Dash v. Mitchell

356 F. Supp. 1292 - Dash v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2019

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

3019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1343

Relies on Baker v. Carr · Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Griswold v. State of Connecticut · Flast v. Cohen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Dash v. Mitchell, 356 F. Supp. 1292, 1295 (D.C.D.C. 1972), citing Davis, Standing: Taxpayers and Others, 35 U. Chi. L. Rev. 601 , 607 (1968). Injury in fact is what the Supreme Court has thought imparts that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “detention inflicts irreparable injury on persons detained by subjecting them to incarceration without any compensation, even if the detention is subsequently held to have been wrongfully imposed”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Injury in fact is what the Supreme Court has thought imparts that “adversary context” to litigation required by the “case or controversy” clause of Article III of the Constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.