In Re Baldinger’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 32 (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1621 · 18 U.S.C. § 2514 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 6002 · 18 U.S.C. § 6003 · 47 U.S.C. § 409
Relies on Powell v. McCormack · Kastigar v. United States · Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco · See v. City of Seattle · United States v. Classic
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“prosecution for perjury, giving a false statement, or otherwise failing to comply with the order.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“An exception of course is made for criminal offenses committed during the testimony, such as perjury and false statement and for failure to comply with the order itself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.