356 Ill. App. 3d 208 - People v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently November 2023
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Hill · 145 Ill. 2d 441 - People v. Thingvold · 187 Ill. 2d 144 - People v. Buss · 66 Ill. 2d 261 - People v. Boose · 28 Cal. 4th 1201 - People v. Mar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[t]he seriousness of the present charge against the defendant; defendant's temperament and character; his age and physical attributes; his past record; past escapes or attempted escapes, and evidence of a present plan to escape; threats to harm others or cause a disturbance; self-destructive tendencies; the risk of mob violence or of attempted revenge by others; the possibility of rescue by other offenders still at large; the size and mood of the audience; the nature and physical security of the courtroom; and the adequacy and availability of alternative remedies.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“rather than proceeding immediately to a new trial, this problem can be remedied by remanding the case to the trial court for a retrospective Boose hearing. If the hearing reveals an adequate basis for having used the stun belt, then the defendant's conviction should stand. If, however, the Boose analysis does not favor using the belt, then a new trial would be indicated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“ignore[d] the obvious difference between visible shackles and a concealed security device.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.