People v. Rosenberg’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on General Oil Co. v. Crain · 147 Ill. 2d 326 - People v. Frieberg · 196 Ill. 2d 236 - People v. Ortiz · 172 Ill. 2d 452 - People v. Robinson · 163 Ill. 2d 250 - People v. Hickman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Except for purposes as authorized by this Act, any person who knowingly brings or causes to be brought into this State for the - 11 - purpose of manufacture or delivery or with the intent to manufacture or deliver a controlled substance other than methamphetamine or counterfeit substance in this or any other state or country is guilty of controlled substance trafficking.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Allen“To sustain a charge of controlled substance trafficking, the State must prove that the defendant, with knowledge, brought into this state a controlled substance for the purpose of delivery or with the intent to deliver.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Allen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.