356 Ill. App. 3d 390 - People v. Pearson’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
July 2013
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Estelle v. Williams · 122 Ill. 2d 176 - People v. Enoch · Morgan v. Illinois · Coffin v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(a) *** The court shall acquaint prospective jurors with the general duties and responsibilities of jurors. (b) If requested by the defendant, the court shall ask each potential juror, individually or in a group, whether that juror understands and accepts the following principles: (1) that the defendant is presumed innocent of the charge(s) against him or her; (2) that before a defendant can be convicted the State must prove the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; (3) that the defendant is not required to offer any evidence on his or her own behalf; and (4) that the defendant’s failure to testify cannot be held against him or her; however, no inquiry of a prospective juror shall be made into the defendant’s failure to testify when the defendant objects.” 177 Ill. 2d R. 431.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““ ‘In making the determination whether the specified errors resulted in the required prejudice, a court should presume, absent challenge to the judgment on grounds of evidentiary insufficiency, that the judge or jury acted according to law.’ Strickland, 466 U.S. at 649 , 80 L. Ed. 2d at 698 , 104 S. Ct. at 2068 .” Pearson, 356 Ill. App. 3d at 398 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““We conclude Rule 431(a) requires trial judges to inform prospective jurors about a defendant’s basic rights, as set out in Rule 431(b), so that they will be informed about their ‘general duties and responsibilities.’ 177 Ill. 2d R. 431. Failure to do so is error.” (Emphasis added.) Pearson, 356 Ill. App. 3d at 400 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.