¶1The foregoing opinion by BOHLING, C., is adopted as the opinion of the Court en Banc. Douglas, Hyde and Leedy, JJ., andTipton, C.J., concur. Conkling, Clark and Ellison, JJ., dissent.
356 Mo. 568
Rush v. Thompson
Decided May 12, 1947
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1947-05-12
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 1989
2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →