State v. Pearson’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
September 2016
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Franks v. Delaware · United States v. Sokolow · Hayes v. Florida · State v. Harvey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[E]vidence will not be suppressed unless it has been obtained as a consequence of the officer's unlawful conduct.... The evidence must be such that it would not have been obtained but for the unlawful conduct of the investigating officer.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“the collection of the evidence obtained ... was not causally related to the statutory violations ... because [the statutes requiring return of inventory of evidence obtained from a person subject to nontestimonial identification procedures] focus on policies to be followed after samples are taken ... [and] are not related to obtaining the samples.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is obtained as a result of a substantial violation of the provisions of [Chapter 15A of our General Statutes].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.