State v. Mathisen’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 2016
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann · Oyler v. Boles · United States v. Balint · Crawford v. Board of Education of City of Los Angeles · Thomas v. Zant, Superintendent, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““To support a defense of selective prosecution a defendant must establish that other individuals similarly situated have not generally been prosecuted and that the State's selection of him for prosecution is invidious or in bad faith; that is, based upon constitutionally impermissible considerations such as wealth.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Francis · State v. Wilt“the trial court’s denial of Mathisen’s request for a jury trial, immediately preceding his trial and subsequent to his valid waiver, did not constitute error under the circumstances of this case.” 356 N.W.2d at 135 . See Wyatt v. United States, 591 F.2d 260 (4th Cir.1979) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lawyer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.