Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 356 Or. 4 - State v. Walker

State v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

2 district · 16 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As we have previously explained, ORICO was modeled on and closely parallels the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act statute, under which violations turn”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “on the multiplicity of crimes and the 'organized character' of those crimes, which together suggested that some form of organization was behind their commission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “conspire[d] *** to conduct and/or participate *** in [an] enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.