Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 356 P2D 141 - State v. Moore

State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 1999
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 1999

7 state decisions

201960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of Rock Springs v. Sturm · Fanchon & Marco, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. · 1 Cal. App. 2d 545 - Samuels v. Singer · Bryant v. Cadle · Murdock v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * the final judgment should grant all of the relief to which the plaintiff is entitled whether or not it has been demanded in the pleadings.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “actual, open, notorious, exclusive, and continuous for the statutory period, hostile, and under color of title or claim of right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in the absence of explanatory circumstances showing the contrary,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.