Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 356 P2D 339 - Wills v. Dissing

Wills v. Dissing’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 1976
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Weitz v. Moulden · Antle v. Hartman · In Re Lillie's Estate · Bush v. Bush · Flowers v. Flowers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Plaintiffs assert that the evidence does not sustain a gift to the defendant; that no consideration was plead or proven. Love and affection are certainly a valid consideration, and the deed itself recites a consideration. For that matter, the evidence is clear that the defendant accepted the gift if it were one and the finding of the court, which inheres in the judgment, that if-it-were a gift that all elements of a valid, gift inter, viv.os were present is not clearly against the weight of the evidence.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.