Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 356 P.2d 779 - Davidson v. Simms

Davidson v. Simms’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 1964
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ponzi v. Fessenden · 96 Okla. Crim. 231 - Traxler v. State · Thacker v. Marshall · 90 Okla. Crim. 329 - Hurst v. Pitman · Jennings v. Raines

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Although no appeal will lie directly from a judgment of the Justice of the Peace court to the Criminal Court of Appeals, where said Justice of the Peace court sits as a committing magistrate for the purpose of holding a preliminary examination for one accused of a felony, the proceedings before such magistrate may be reduced to writing and filed with a transcript in the District Court, and any error in such proceedings may later be presented to the Criminal Court of Appeals for review in case of a conviction in the District Court. For that reason, in a proper case, mandamus may lie from the Criminal Court of Appeals to a Justice of the Peace court sitting as a committing magistrate, and the issuance of such writ would be in aid of its exclusive appellate jurisdiction in criminal cases.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.