Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 356 Pa. 69 - Brooks v. Conston

Brooks v. Conston’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

68 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Frowen v. Blank (1981), Kalyvas v. Kalyvas (1952)

68 state decisions

16019461950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dorrance's Estate · Leedom v. Palmer · Belmont Laboratories, Inc. v. Heist · Null's Estate · McCown v. Fraser

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Confidential relation is any relation existing between parties to a transaction wherein one of the parties is bound to act with the utmost good faith for the benefit of the other party and can take no advantage to himself from his acts relating to the interest of the other party.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “While the findings of fact of a chancellor, supported by competent evidence, and affirmed by the court in banc, are conclusive upon appeal: Belmont v. Heist, 300 Pa. 542 ; Clark's Est., 303 Pa. 538 ; Brinton v. Davidson, 308 Pa. 371 , such rule does not apply in favor of the deductions or inferences which are made by the chancellor from the facts which he has found. The conclusions of the chancellor being no more than his reasoning from the facts, are always reviewable upon appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “. . . a confidential relationship is not limited to any particular association of parties but exists wherever one occupies toward another such a position of advisor or counsellor as reasonably to inspire confidence that he will act in good faith for the other's interest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.