356 Pa. Super. 355 - Commonwealth v. Luckenbaugh’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Passaro · 256 Pa. Super. 125 - Commonwealth v. Borden · 335 Pa. Super. 51 - Commonwealth v. Padden · 300 Pa. Super. 315 - Commonwealth v. Clark · 307 Pa. Super. 129 - Commonwealth v. Milligan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Following sentencing, appellant filed a motion for reconsideration. He then escaped from custody. As a result, the lower court dismissed his motion, finding that appellant had forfeited any right to have his claims considered. See Commonwealth v. Passaro, 504 Pa. 611 , 476 A.2d 346 (1984). This Court, however, may exercise its discretion and permit review of such claims when the appellant has returned to the jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.