Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 356 S.C. 111 - Bray v. Marathon Corp.

Bray v. Marathon Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently February 2025

14 state decisions

80200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kinard v. Augusta Sash & Door Co. · Padgett v. Colonial Wholesale Distributing Co. · 572 F. Supp. 1201 - Gnirk v. Ford Motor Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because [section] 15-73­ 10 limits liability to the user or consumer, there is no need for a limitation on foreseeable victims to avoid disproportionate liability as was found necessary in the bystander setting.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.