356 So. 2d 1101 - Bruner v. Bruner’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 1983
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 348 So. 2d 75 - Pearce v. Pearce · Loyacano v. Loyacano · 301 So. 2d 622 - Fulmer v. Fulmer · Martin v. Stone · Savin v. Savin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There is no evidence showing these payments were made at the request of or with the consent of appellee. Therefore, under the jurisprudence these credits should not have been allowed.” (Citation omitted.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thompson v. Thompson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.