356 So. 2d 1179 - Dase v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 2013 · most notably 538 So. 2d 329 - Pinkney v. State (1988), 533 So. 2d 473 - Lanier v. State (1988)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 355 So. 2d 1381 - Odom v. State · Hancock v. State · Wells v. State · West v. State · Cotton v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) whether the question was relevant to the voir dire examination (2) whether it was unambiguous (3) whether the juror had substantial knowledge of the information sought to be elicited.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We find it impossible to believe that the juror could have forgotten so shocking an event as her son's violent death in a month's time... . ( 356 So.2d at 1182 ).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Have any of you or members of your immediate family ever been the victim of a crime or a violent crime?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brooks v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.