State v. Camper

Decided April 4, 1978

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1978-04-04

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

““. . . the speedy trial time does not begin to run in favor of an individual who is incarcerated in another jurisdiction and against whom a detainer has been lodged until the authority which filed the detain-er obtains custody of the individual.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including State ex rel. Avera v. Harper

Relies on 352 So. 2d 98 - Eaddy v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1978-04-04

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently March 2007 · most notably 467 So. 2d 1103 - Somero v. Hendry General Hosp. (1985), 403 So. 2d 502 - CTY. NAT. BANK OF NORTH MIAMI BEACH v. Sheridan, Inc. (1981)

39 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

MOORE, Judge.

¶1The State appeals the granting of appel-lee’s motion for discharge pursuant to Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.191(a)(1). In Eaddy v. State, 352 So.2d 98 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) this court held that the speedy trial time does not begin to run in favor of an individual who is incarcerated in another jurisdiction and against whom a detainer has been lodged until the authority which filed the detainer obtains custody of the individual. It is unfortunate that the learned trial judge was without the benefit of Eaddy, supra,at the time of his decision. Accordingly, the trial court’s order discharging the appellee is REVERSED and this cause REMANDED with instructions to reinstate the charges against the appellee.

¶2REVERSED and REMANDED.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.