Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

356 So. 2d 1339

DeArmas v. Blonstein

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1978-04-04

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 2018

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1978-04-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1This is an appeal by the plaintiffs below from an order dismissing an action filed by them on April 28, 1976 for damages for personal injuries received by appellant, Gardenia DeArmas, as a result of an automobile accident alleged to have been caused by the defendant, Nathan Blonstein, against whom, with his indemnity liability insurer, the action was brought.

¶2The defendant-insurer filed an answer denying coverage. On September 14, 1976, the attorneys for the defendant-insurer filed a suggestion of death, stating that the said Nathan Blonstein had died prior to the filing of the complaint. He had died in January of 1976, some three months prior to the filing of the action.

¶3On February 1, 1977, the defendant-insurer filed a motion to dismiss. There was no substitution of parties. See: Fla.R. Civ.P. 1.260(a)(1) and (2). The motion was granted by an order wherein the court stated: “and judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of the Defendant and against the Plaintiffs, with costs to be hereafter taxed, and the Plaintiff shall go hence without day”.

¶4Appealing therefrom, appellant contends the dismissal of the action was error. We hold no error was thereby committed, but amend the dismissal order to be one without prejudice.

¶5Judgment affirmed as amended.

/356/so2d/1339 · .json · Public domain