356 So. 2d 315 - State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

cited by 46 later decisions

states following

August 2018

most recently cited

45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably 588 So. 2d 957 - Department of Law Enf. v. Real Property (1991), 603 So. 2d 1175 - Standard Jury Instructions-Criminal Cases (1992)

45 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Lockmiller v. Mayo · Shargaa v. State · Barnhill v. State · 231 So. 2d 526 - Nichols v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“[a]ny person who is convicted of a fourth or subsequent [DUI violation] is guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 575 So. 2d 1262 - State v. Rodriguez · 528 So. 2d 1272 - Pritchard v. State
“creates a substantive offense and is thus distinguishable from [s]ection 775.084, the habitual criminal offender statute.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 575 So. 2d 1262 - State v. Rodriguez · 595 So. 2d 1052 - Clay v. State
“"would substantially destroy the historical presumption of innocence which clothes every defendant in a criminal case[,] and in the mind of the average juror [it] would in a measure place upon the accused the burden of showing himself innocent rather than upon the State the responsibility of proving him guilty." ... . If the presumption of innocence is destroyed by proof of an unrelated offense, it is more easily destroyed by proof of a similar, related offense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 575 So. 2d 1262 - State v. Rodriguez · 754 So. 2d 691 - State v. Harbaugh

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.