Cradduck v. State

Decided December 13, 1977

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1977-12-13

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“Whether the speedy trial time provisions of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191(b)(1) apply to a defendant who, after being arrested or charged, is thereafter imprisoned on an unrelated charge?”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Cradduck v. State

Relies on State v. Lewis

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1977-12-13

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently February 2014 · most notably 393 So. 2d 1177 - Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Dept. of Business (1981), 428 So. 2d 720 - Barker v. Board of Medical Examiners, Dept. of Prof. Reg. (1983)

28 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

¶2On petition for rehearing appellant says the principal question here is the same as in State v. Lewis, Fla. 4th DCA, Case No. 76-2712, 352 So.2d 93 and therefore the issue resolved by us is one of great public interest and should be certified to the Supreme Court which has accepted jurisdiction in State v. Lewis, supra.

¶3We agree and hereby certify to the Supreme Court the decision in this case passes upon the same question of great public interest as in State v. Lewis, our Case No. 76-2712, 352 So.2d 93, Supreme Court Case No. 52,610 which is:

Whether the speedy trial time provisions of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191 (b)(1) applies to a defendant who, after being arrested or charged, is thereafter imprisoned on an unrelated charge?

¶4The petition for rehearing is otherwise denied.

CROSS, DOWNEY and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.