356 So. 2d 787 - Tatzel v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently February 1997
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 212 So. 2d 777 - American Bankers Life Assur. Co. of Fla. v. Williams · 262 So. 2d 655 - DeLaine v. State · 118 So. 2d 664 - Vocelle v. Knight Brothers Paper Company · Bell v. State · Brooks v. Anastasia Mosquito Control District
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) As used in this section, unless the context clearly requires otherwise: (a) The term `prostitution' shall be construed to include the giving or receiving of the body for sexual intercourse for hire, and shall also be construed to include the giving or receiving of the body for licentious sexual intercourse without hire. (b) The term `lewdness' shall be construed to include any indecent or obscene act. (c) The term `assignation' shall be construed to include the making of any appointment or engagement for prostitution or lewdness or any act in furtherance of such appointment or engagement.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“(3) It shall further be unlawful in the state: (a) To offer to commit, or to commit, or to engage in, prostitution, lewdness, or assignation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“WHEREAS, Black's Law Dictionary (Rev. 4th ed. 1968) defines `pistol' as:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.