Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 356 So. 2d 873 - Dukes v. State

356 So. 2d 873 - Dukes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2016

17 state decisions

9019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 335 So. 2d 280 - Fulton v. State · 337 So. 2d 852 - Houston v. State · 350 So. 2d 552 - Thorpe v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “essential fairness of [his] criminal trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Now, he brought in this Jewell Blakley, admittedly a prostitute, admittedly a woman who has sold heroin to the same agent, A.W. Jackson, at the same location, 524 West Jackson Street, here in Orange County, and a woman who has admittedly been convicted of crimes so many times that she can't even remember. And I tell you, ladies and gentlemen, that she is an incredible witness, and she is not worthy of your belief. She is a liar, clear and simple.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Now, you heard our case, and then you heard his case. You heard his witnesses, his prostitute, heroin pusher, convicted so many times she cannot count; who would think nothing of getting up on the stand and telling a lie for her buddy, Fred Dukes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.