356 So. 2d 925 - Continental Dev., Etc. v. Duval Title, Etc.’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 2017
1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 334 So. 2d 13 - Shaw v. Shaw · 349 So. 2d 1187 - Helman v. Seaboard Coast Line R. Co. · 91 So. 2d 320 - Augustine v. Southern Bell Telephone & Tel. Co. · 177 So. 2d 486 - Gates v. Utsey · Tampa Electric Company v. Ferguson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when there is competent evidence to support the findings and judgments of the trial court it is the duty of this court to affirm.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“We recognize that malice will be presumed if the disparagement of title to real property is false, causes damage, and is not privileged. [ ] The presumption of malice, however, can be overcome by the showing of privilege. [ ] A showing of privilege rebuts the presumption of malice and the plaintiff must then prove actual malice in order to recover in a slander of title action. [ ] The affirmative defense of good faith raises a privilege and creates a factual issue as to the existence of malice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.