356 So. 2d 936 - State v. Cass’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently August 2009 · most notably 360 So. 2d 500 - State v. Drew (1978), 389 So. 2d 1263 - State v. Douglas (1980)
38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · United States v. Ash · 337 So. 2d 1177 - State v. Marks · 350 So. 2d 615 - State v. Sheppard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To constitute res gestae the circumstances and declarations must be necessary incidents of the criminal act, or immediate concomitants of it, or form in conjunction with it one continuous transaction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“undue hardship or extreme inconvenience.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"Article 841 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides that an irregularity or error cannot be availed of after verdict unless defendant has made known to the court his objection and the grounds therefor. It is well settled that defendant must state the basis for his objection when he makes it so that the trial judge has an opportunity to rule on it and to prevent or to cure the error. An objection stating no basis presents nothing for this court to review. State v. Lewis, 353 So.2d 703 (La.1977); State v. Burnette, 337 So.2d 1096 (La.1976); State v. Sosa, 328 So.2d 889 (La.1976)." [Emphasis supplied.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.