356 So. 2d 965 - Brown v. Sutton’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently October 2015
1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Permian Basin Area Rate Cases · Elgin Ry Co v. Burley · City of Yonkers v. United States · Montana Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission · White v. Louisiana Public Service Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Section 5 C [LSA-R.S. 30:5C] sets forth that the Commissioner can unitize, pool and consolidate ‘only after notice.’ Section 6 of Title 30 authorizes the Commissioner to prescribe rules of procedure. Rule 12 of the ‘Rules of Procedure for Conducting Hearings Before the Commissioner of Conservation,’ effective September 1, 1971, pertinently provides that ‘If the application relates to a poolwide unit, then a copy of the application shall be furnished each Interested Owner and Represented Party.’ Brown, 356 So.2d at 970 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“As a general proposition, it is reasonable to expect one with knowledge of notice of an administrative proceeding affecting his rights not to stand by until the day of the hearing and then for the first time assert lack of notice. (Citations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to avoid the drilling of unnecessary wells,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.