Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 356 S.W.3d 196 - Roberts v. State

Roberts v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Deck v. State · State v. Ramsey · State v. Nunley · Strong v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘ “[T]he selection of witnesses and the introduction of evidence are questions of trial strategy and virtually unchallengeable.” ’ Johnson v . State, 333 S.W.3d 459, 463-64 (Mo. banc 2011) (citation omitted). Trial counsel will not be found ineffective for failing to present cumulative evidence.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.