356 U.S.
Volume 356 — United States Reports
106 opinions
- 356 U.S. 1Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States (1958)AffirmedSupreme Court of the United States
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 356 of the United States Reports:
- 356 U.S. 21American Motors Corporation v. City of Kenosha (1958)AffirmedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 22Zivnostenska Banka, National Corp. v. Stephen (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 23Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Co. v. United States (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 24Marshall v. Brucker, Secretary of the Army (1958)Reversed and remandedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 25Howard v. United States (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 26Shelton v. United States (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 27Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Sullivan (1958)AffirmedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 30Tank Truck Rentals, Inc. v. Commissioner (1958)AffirmedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 38Hoover Motor Express Co. v. United States (1958)AffirmedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 41Ferguson v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. (1958)Reversed and remandedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 42Hurley v. Ragen, Warden (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 43Columbia Broacasting System, Inc. v. Loew's Inc. (1958)AffirmedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 44Perez v. Brownell (1958)Overruled (1967)Supreme Court of the United States
Perez v. Brownell, 356 U.S. 44 (1958), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court affirmed Congress's right to revoke United States citizenship as a result of a citizen's voluntary performance of specified actions, even in the absence of any intent or desire on the person's part to lose citizenship. Specifically, the Supreme Court upheld an act of Congress which provided for revocation of citizenship as a consequence of voting in a foreign election.
Overruled by Afroyim v. Rusk (1967) - 356 U.S. 86Trop v. Dulles (1958)Held federal statute unconstitutionalSupreme Court of the United States
Trop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86 (1958), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that it was unconstitutional to revoke citizenship as a punishment for a crime. The ruling's reference to "evolving standards of decency" is frequently cited in Eighth Amendment jurisprudence.
- 356 U.S. 129Nishikawa v. Dulles (1958)Reversed and remandedSupreme Court of the United States
Nishikawa v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 129 (1958), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that a dual United States/Japanese citizen who had served in the Japanese military during World War II could not be denaturalized unless the United States could prove that he had acted voluntarily.
- 356 U.S. 148Brown v. United States (1958)AffirmedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 165Green v. United States (1958)AffirmedSupreme Court of the United States
Held: to sentences of imprisonment exceeding one year, need not be prosecuted by indictment under the Fifth Amendment. In various respects, such as the absence of a statutory limitation of the amount of a fine or the length of a prison sentence which may be imposed for their commission, criminal contempts have always differed from the usual statutory crime under federal law.
- 356 U.S. 225Cantwell v. Cantwell (1958)
- 356 U.S. 225Peoria Transit Lines, Inc. v. City of Peoria (1958)
- 356 U.S. 226Strong v. United States (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 227United States v. F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co. (1958)ReversedSupreme Court of the United States
Held: that the opinion stated the amount of money illegally collected from respondent and, therefore, adequately determined the amount awarded, and that inasmuch as the clerk's entry incorporated the opinion by reference, it, too, adequately stated the amount of the judgment.
- 356 U.S. 252GRIMES v. RAYMOND CONCRETE PILE CO. Et Al. (1958)Reversed and remandedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 256Matles v. United States (1958)Reversed and remandedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 257United States v. Dave Diamond (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 258Mendoza-Martinez v. MacKey (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 259Dandridge v. United States (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 260Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. P G Lake (1958)ReversedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 269Dessalernos v. Savoretti (1958)Vacated and remandedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 271Butler v. Whiteman (1958)Reversed and remandedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 273Georgia v. United States (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 274Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Smith (1958)ReversedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 282Denver Union Stock Yard Company v. Producers Livestock Marketing Association Benson (1958)AffirmedSupreme Court of the United States
Held: or kept for sale or shipment in commerce.' 3 Section 301(b) defines the term 'stockyard services' to mean 'services or facilities furnished at a stockyard in connection with the receiving, buying, or selling on a commission basis or otherwise, marketing, feeding, watering, holding, delivery, shipment, weighing, or handling in commerce, of livestock.' 4 Section 301(d) of the Act defines the term 'dealer' to mean 'any…
- 356 U.S. 309Panama Canal Company v. Grace Line Grace Line (1958)ReversedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 320Alaska Industrial Board v. Chugach Electric Ass'n (1958)Reversed and remandedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 326Sinkler v. Missouri Pacific Railroad (1958)Reversed and remandedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 335Jung v. K. & D. Mining Co. (1958)Reversed and remandedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 339New Yorker Magazine, Inc. v. Gerosa (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 342National Labor Relations Board v. Wooster Division of Borgwarner Corp. (1958)Reversed and remandedSupreme Court of the United States
NLRB v. Borg-Warner Corp., 356 U.S. 342 (1958), was a United States Supreme Court case interpreting the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The Court held that an employer commits an unfair labor practice when it insists to impasse on bargaining over a permissive (non-mandatory) subject of bargaining as a condition of reaching a collective bargaining agreement. The ruling clarified the distinction between mandatory and permissive subjects under Section 8(d) of the NLRA and limited the issues that either party could lawfully insist upon during negotiations.
- 356 U.S. 363Yates v. United States (1958)Vacated and remandedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 368Ratner v. United States (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 369Sherman v. United States (1958)Reversed and remandedSupreme Court of the United States
Sherman v. United States, 356 U.S. 369 (1958), was a United States Supreme Court case on the issue of entrapment. Unanimously, the Court overturned the conviction of a recovering New York drug addict who had been repeatedly solicited for drug sales by a fellow former addict who was working with federal agents.
- 356 U.S. 386Masciale v. United States (1958)AffirmedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 390Thomas v. Arizona (1958)AffirmedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 405United States v. Cores (1958)Reversed and remandedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 412County of Marin v. United States (1958)Reversed and remandedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 421Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. United States (1958)Reversed and remandedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 464Hoag v. State of New Jersey (1958)Overruled (1970)Supreme Court of the United StatesOverruled by Ashe v. Swenson (1970)
- 356 U.S. 481Federal Maritime Board v. Isbrandtsen Co. (1958)AffirmedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 525Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. (1958)Reversed and remandedSupreme Court of the United States
Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., 356 U.S. 525 (1958), decided on May 19, 1958, was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that refined the doctrine regarding in what instances courts were required to follow state law.
- 356 U.S. 560Payne v. Arkansas (1958)Reversed and remandedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 571Ciucci v. Illinois (1958)AffirmedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 576Sacher v. United States (1958)Reversed and remandedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 581Babcock v. California (1958)
- 356 U.S. 581North Western-Hanna Fuel Co. v. United States (1958)
- 356 U.S. 582New York Trap Rock Corp. v. Clarkstown (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 583Alhambra Gold Mine Corp. v. Alhambra-Shumway Mines, Inc. (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 584Eubanks v. State of Louisiana (1958)Reversed and remandedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 590Rainwater v. United States (1958)AffirmedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 595United States v. McNinch (1958)Affirmed and reversed in part, remandedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 604Kovacs v. Brewer (1958)Vacated and remandedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 617International Association Machinists v. Gonzales (1958)AffirmedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 634International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Russell (1958)AffirmedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 660Nowak v. United States (1958)Reversed and remandedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 670Maisenberg v. United States (1958)Reversed and remandedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 674Ellis v. United States (1958)Vacated and remandedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 676Amlin v. Verbeem (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 677United States v. Procter & Gamble Co. (1958)ReversedSupreme Court of the United States
Held: outweighed the reasons behind the policy for maintaining secrecy of the grand jury proceedings. D.C., 19 F.R.D. 122, 128. 2 The District Court entered orders directing the Government to produce the transcript in 30 days and to permit appellees to inspect and copy it.
- 356 U.S. 691Bonetti v. Rogers (1958)ReversedSupreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 704Hill v. United States (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 906Chicago Milwaukee St Paul and Pacific Railroad Co v. State of Illinois (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 910Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Vance (1958)
- 356 U.S. 910McCraw v. Woodruff (1958)
- 356 U.S. 916Panama Canal Co. v. Grace Line, Inc. (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 916First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. County of Los Angeles (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 916City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of Tacoma (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 917Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. McCracken (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 926Cutting v. United States Treasury Department (1958)
- 356 U.S. 926Territory of Alaska v. American Can Co. (1958)
- 356 U.S. 928United States v. Louisiana (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 929Barenblatt v. United States (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 934City of Detroit v. Murray Corp. of America (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 949Cirillo v. United States (1958)
- 356 U.S. 949De Casaus v. United States (1958)
- 356 U.S. 955California v. Washington (1958)
- 356 U.S. 955Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co. (1958)
- 356 U.S. 965Uphaus v. Wyman (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 965Aqua Hotel Corp. v. McLaughlin (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 967Pressed Steel Car Co. v. United States (1958)
- 356 U.S. 967Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Railroad Retirement Board (1958)
- 356 U.S. 969Bartkus v. Illinois (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 971Schleich v. Butterfield (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 971Caritativo v. California (1958)Supreme Court of the United States
- 356 U.S. 975Local 174 & Joint Council No. 28 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Selles (1958)