Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 356 U.S. 129 - Nishikawa v. Dulles

Nishikawa v. Dulles’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

278
cited by 278 later decisions
17
cited 17 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

128 federal appellate · 24 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 278 later decisions (17 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2025 · most notably Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez (1963), Herman & MacLean v. Huddleston (1983)

128 federal appellate · 24 district · 26 state decisions

64019581960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedMitsugi Nishikawa v. John Foster Dulles, as Secretary of State (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1481 (§ 349 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1482

Relies on Trop v. Dulles · Osborn v. President Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States · Leland v. Oregon · Tot v. United States · Schneiderman v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 278 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “as far as is reasonably possible in favor of the citizen.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. H · S
  2. ““Regardless of what conduct is alleged to result in expatriation, whenever the issue of voluntariness is put in issue, the Government must in each case prove voluntary conduct by clear, convincing and unequivocal evidence.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'may be highly persuasive evidence ... of a purpose to abandon citizenship,'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.