United States v. Cores’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
247 federal appellate · 21 district · 74 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 438 later decisions (19 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2026 · most notably Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-Mendoza (1984), Toussie v. United States (1970)
247 federal appellate · 21 district · 74 state decisions — followed in 16 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Borden Co. · United States v. Kissel · United States v. Johnson · United States v. Anderson · Hyde v. Shine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 438 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The provision for trial in the vicinity of the crime is a safeguard against the unfairness and hardship involved when an accused is prosecuted in a remote place. Provided its language permits, the Act in question should be given that construction which will respect such considerations.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be ... held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.