In Re Garrett’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
June 2015
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 362
Relies on United States Fire Insurance v. Royal Insurance · In Re Charles · In Re Montoya · In Re Moon · Whitaker v. Baxter (In Re Whitaker)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While there is no dispute that ... [the] Bank did not file an objection to the plan ..., the Court finds that the confirmed plan is not dispositive of the automatic stay issue now before the Court. The Court notes that there is nothing in the confirmation order which addresses the continuation or termination of the automatic stay as to ... [the] Bank. The stay issue remained pending despite confirmation of the ... plan, and the Court finds that it was appropriate for the Bank to rely on its pending objection to the continuation of the automatic stay to preserve that issue despite confirmation of the ... plan. In effect, the Court finds that confirmation of the ... plan was merely binding upon the Bank as to the treatment of its claim in the event of a finding by the Court that the automatic stay should be continued as to the Bank.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.