Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 357 F.2d 438 - Davis v. United States

Davis v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

357 F.2d 438 · 1966

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

58 federal appellate · 3 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2024 · most notably United States v. Polizzi (1974), United States v. Bright (1980)

58 federal appellate · 3 district · 7 state decisions

3101966197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1992 · 18 U.S.C. § 3481 · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on Griffin v. California · Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor · Russell v. United States · United States v. Debrow · Hartman v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The facts and circumstances of each case must be carefully analyzed to determine ‘whether the language used was manifestly intended or was of such character that the jury would naturally and necessarily take it to be a comment on the failure of the accused to testify.’ ””
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It is important to observe that the rule does not prohibit all comment on testimony or evidence which stands uncontradicted, and the right to make such statements is well established....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “have your people . . . testify if you want them to”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.