Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 357 F.2d 557 - Richard Wallach v. Norman Cannon, Oklahoma Tax Commission

Richard Wallach v. Norman Cannon, Oklahoma Tax Commission’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

4 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 2013

4 district · 2 state decisions

60196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Collins v. Hardyman · Peterson v. City of Greenville · Messenger v. United States · Avent v. State of North Carolina · Love v. Chandler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire * * * for the purpose of depriving * * * any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws, [and] * * * if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy * * * the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages * * * against any one or more of the conspirators.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage of any State or territory, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in any action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, (emphasis supplied).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.