Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 357 F.2d 794 - Rosen v. Sugarman

Rosen v. Sugarman’s Empirical Analysis

357 F.2d 794 · 1966

Citation profile

158
cited by 158 later decisions
8
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

71 federal appellate · 8 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 158 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably United States v. Tropiano (1969), United States v. International Business Machines Corp. (1980)

71 federal appellate · 8 district · 11 state decisions

580196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · La Buy v. Howes Leather Co. · Berger v. United States · Lehigh Valley Cooperative Farmers, Inc. v. United States · Wolf v. Weinstein

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 158 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must give fair support to the charge of a bent of mind that may prevent or impede impartiality of judgment.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “few situations more appropriate for mandamus than a judge's clearly wrongful refusal to disqualify himself.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The exhumation of these episodes from the long history of a toilsome case serves rather as a chastening reminder of how easily impatience in a judge, even if understandable, can produce the appearance of unfairness. . . . . . . Nevertheless we cannot say that the sum of these episodes required the judge to disqualify himself . . .. [122]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.