Dwyer v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
357 F.2d 978 · 1966
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently August 1993
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1498 · 35 U.S.C. § 101 · 35 U.S.C. § 103
Relies on Lincoln Engineering Co of Illinois v. Stewart-Warner Corporation · Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. Winters · Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp. · Reckendorfer v. Faber · Ritter v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must be regarded as material, and since the amendment operates as a disclaimer of that difference it must be strictly construed against him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.