Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 357 F.3d 812 - Nyama v. Ashcroft

Nyama v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

357 F.3d 812 · 2004

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
May 2024
most recently cited

51 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Chay-Velasquez v. Ashcroft (2004), Wiransane v. Ashcroft (2004)

51 federal appellate ·

650200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Diallo v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Espinoza v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Perinpanathan v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Regalado-Garcia v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`probative and its admission . . . fundamentally fair,'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.