Powell v. Lambert’s Empirical Analysis
357 F.3d 871 · 2004
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 2021 · most notably Vizcarra-Ayala v. Mukasey (2008), Lopez v. Schriro (2007)
11 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on William O'sullivan v. Darren Boerckel · Maleng v. Cook · Duncan v. Henry · Ford v. Georgia · Benn v. Lambert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f a state procedural bar is an adequate and independent ground for dismissal, habeas corpus is foreclosed in federal court....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ngo v. S Woodford Ap
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.