Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

357 F. App'x 855

Daihui Chen v. Holder

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided December 9, 2009

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2009-12-09

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Zara v. Ashcroft

Decided 2009-12-09

¶1 MEMORANDUM

¶2 Daihui Chen, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.

¶3 We lack jurisdiction to review Chen’s challenge to the adverse credibility determination because Chen failed to exhaust the challenge before the BIA. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1); Zara v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 927, 930 (9th Cir.2004) (“A petitioner cannot satisfy the exhaustion requirement by making a general challenge to the IJ’s decision, but, rather, must specify which issues form the basis of the appeal.”).

¶4 PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

¶5 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

/357/fappx/855 · .json · Public domain