357 F. Supp. 2d 112 - Wolf v. Central Intelligence Agency’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 502 · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Department of the Air Force v. Rose · Central Intelligence Agency v. Sims · Military Audit Project v. Casey · Oglesby v. United States Department of the Army
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no indication from the transcript [of the congressional hearing] that the CIA director was reading from anything more than a prepared statement for the hearing,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“that the CIA has collected intelligence information on or recruited one of its citizens or resident aliens.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“that the CIA maintains information concerning a covert relationship with a particular foreign national”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.