Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 357 FSUPP2D 369 - Stanton v. Metro Corp.

Stanton v. Metro Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
February 2006
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Time, Inc. v. Hill · Eyal v. Helen Broadcasting Corp. · Angie Chesser v. Amos Sparks · Langadinos v. American Airlines, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[e]ven the relatively harmless conduct identified by [Metro in support of its argument] is presented [in the article] in such a way as to underscore the principal theme of rampant and promiscuous sexuality among teenagers.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “attending a school prom, watching a Britney Spears video, abstaining from sex, vowing to avoid abusive relationships, or even lying about engaging in sex to defuse the pressure from peers who keep asking about it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “forced to conclude that the disclaimer adequately negates the negative connotations about [the] plaintiff otherwise arising from the article and the photograph, at least in the mind of the reasonable reader.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.