Murray v. Tanea’s Empirical Analysis
2019
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
November 2024
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (§ 101 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Foman v. Davis · Monge v. California · Board of Trustees of the University of Alabamas v. Patricia Garrett · Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth · Tomka v. Seiler Corp.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.