Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 357 N.C. 345 - State v. Carter

State v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lockett v. Ohio · Ashe v. Swenson · Ring v. Arizona · Caldwell v. Mississippi · Gardner v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “once a jury has conclusively determined the existence or nonexistence of a fact, the state is collaterally estopped under the Double Jeopardy Clause from relitigating that same issue in a second criminal proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Defendant has the burden of demonstrating that the issue he seeks to foreclose from relitigation was actually decided in the previous proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.