Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

357 N.C. 453

State v. Finney

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 21, 2003

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 2003-08-21

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2004

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-08-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2The Attorney General’s motion to dismiss defendant’s appeal is allowed.

¶3On its own motion, the Court allows discretionary review as to the following issues:

1. Whether the trial court erred in admitting the hearsay testimony of Detective Haiper as to statements allegedly made to him by the unavailable complainant.
2. Whether the trial court erred in not allowing the defendant to introduce the prior sworn testimony of the unavailable complainant.
3. Whether the trial court erred in its instruction on first-degree rape.

¶4By order of the Court in Conference, this 21st day of August, 2003.

Brady, J. For the Court
/357/nc/453 · .json · Public domain