State v. Cullen’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Wyldes v. Hundley (1995), Olson v. Prosoco, Inc. (1994)
2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Lass · State v. Rouse · State v. Folck · Estate of Bartholomae · State v. Carey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) [Ejvidence from the jurors must consist only of objective facts as to what actually occurred in or out of the jury room bearing on misconduct; (2) the acts or statements complained of must exceed tolerable bounds of jury deliberation; and (3) it must appear the misconduct was calculated to, and with reasonable probability did, influence the verdict.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]rial court has a broad discretion in ruling on these matters. 'We do not find an abuse of discretion ... unless the action of the trial court is clearly unreasonable under the attendant circumstances.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“they absolutely would not have served had they known these witnesses would be called to testify.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.