State v. Nims’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2019
4 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Solem v. Helm · Rummel v. Estelle · Gleason v. United States · State v. Horn · State v. Grady
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Error in the admission of hearsay is presumed to be prejudicial unless the contrary is affirmatively established. Although not specifically.in the hearsay context, we have stated that prejudice will not be found where substantially the same evidence is in the record without objection.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Farris“...the admission of hearsay evidence over a proper objection is presumed to be prejudicial error unless the contrary is affirmatively established. The contrary is established when the record shows that the challenged evidence did not impact on the jury’s finding of guilt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barrett“admission of hearsay evidence over a proper objection is presumed to be prejudicial error unless the contrary is affirmatively established.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.