State v. Layman’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Thayer · 70 Okla. Crim. 304 - Ex Parte Meadows · 67 Okla. Crim. 300 - Ex Parte Barnett · 147 Pa. Super. 410 - Commonwealth v. Mezick · 65 Okla. Crim. 444 - Fannin v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘A false statement of past or existing facts by one person to another with intent to defraud; such statement must be reasonably calculated to deceive that other. It must be so designed as to induce such other to part with his property, and such design must be accomplished, by means of the false pretenses made use of for that purpose.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bartlett v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.