Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 357 SO2D 1105 - State v. Mallett

State v. Mallett’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably 381 So. 2d 416 - State v. Jones (1980), 372 So. 2d 1024 - State v. Hatcher (1979)

43 state decisions

15019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville · Lanzetta v. State New Jersey · 315 So. 2d 675 - State v. Carlisle · State v. Findley · 339 So. 2d 829 - State v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The prohibition against misjoinder of offenses and improper consolidation of offenses for trial is grounded on the possible prejudice arising from a single trial on two or more offenses.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]wo or more offenses may be charged in the same indictment or information ... provided that the offenses joined must be triable by the same mode of trial.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Upon motion of a defendant, or of all defendants if there are more than one, the court may order two or more indictments consolidated for trial if the offenses and the defendants, if there are more than one, could have been joined in a single indictment. The procedure thereafter shall be the same as if the prosecution were under a single indictment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.