Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 357 So. 2d 1128 - State v. Richards

357 So. 2d 1128 - State v. Richards’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
November 1993
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently November 1993 · most notably State v. Hudgins (1988), 441 So. 2d 707 - State v. Flowers (1983)

28 state decisions

140197819801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · United States v. Ventresca · Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State Penitentiary · 290 So. 2d 681 - State v. Paciera

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A search warrant may issue only upon probable cause established to the satisfaction of the judge, by the affidavit of a credible person, reciting facts establishing the cause for issuance of the warrant.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “to evaluate and credit the reliability both of the indirect source and of the indirectly-obtained information.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “probable cause exists when the facts and circumstances within the affiant's knowledge, and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient unto themselves to warrant a man of reasonable caution to believe that an offense has been committed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.